Gre prep words

Posted on

Gre prep words

Gre prep words

Since e-Learning became widespread, critics have started to voice their voices questioning its merits, quality and vitality in general. But is it? Can students at traditional institutions boast more success than Gre prep words those who chose distance learning?

The majority of public and financial institutions of enterprises and state structures would be trampled on the spot if they were afraid of introducing new technologies. The point is that no additional software is needed for successful distance learning. All that is required is a computer connected to the Internet. There are no complicated tools and no expensive software. From a technical point of view, e-learning is a very simple process. Especially considering the fact that most people have fairly reliable computers and constant access to the Internet.

In recent years, the level of social interaction between people has gone off the charts. Many academic e-learning platforms use the rapid growth of social networks such as Facebook and Twitter, enabling people to communicate and interact, thus creating an enabling environment for collaborative learning.

Unlike classical universities, where students are confined to classrooms, those who choose distance learning have the opportunity to communicate with people around the world.

Gre prep words

Computers are not a substitute for people. They simply simplify the learning process, allowing you to reach a wider audience. The profession of the teacher or the teacher is in no way leveled by an e-learning system. On the contrary, professors have the opportunity to reach more students and open a local school, taking a greater share of the market for educational services.

If a student or student is not interested in learning, he or she does not care whether the instructor is watching him or her work. While eLearning does not imply that a student is at a certain time in a certain place, it does provide access to a teacher and other classmates who can provide assistance and support.

An old saying: “You can lead a horse to water, but you cannot make him drink” debunks this myth perfectly. If a student does not have the goal to gain knowledge and achieve success, the program or teacher is not involved. It is silly to blame e-learning for everything. It is a kind of catalyst for the delivery of information, e-learning is not responsible for the bad habits of the student.

Dropout rate and structure of MOOC listeners (top-down): observers, periodic visitors, passive participants, active participants.

Have you ever attended some of the MIT public lectures? Its lecture rooms are exact replicas of traditional classrooms. E-learning students receive the same training as students in traditional universities. The quality of the curriculum is directly related to the instructor who made it up. The method of delivery (in this case, in digital form) does not affect the quality of the product in any way.

For many years, specialists have been trying to find a measure of evaluation of the knowledge obtained. To determine the quality of education through examinations? Success in work? Opportunity to retell the material? It is a problem not only electronic learning. With reliable accuracy it is difficult to define level of the received knowledge not only in sphere of electronic learning, but also traditional too. But the truth is that tools for measurement of success of courses of electronic learning do not differ in any way from those which apply in traditional audiences.

Students sitting in the classroom are more passive than those who choose a distance learning course. In the latter case, the lecturers are more involved in the learning process because they constantly interact with the teacher. In order to give the right answer, the teacher in the online classroom needs a much greater concentration of attention. It is not on the “gallery” to play tetris on your iPhone.